//pragmatic leaders

Competitive Research

Reading time
7 min
Section
PM Foundations (Legacy)
7 min left0%
competitive research0%
7 min left
The biggest challenge for Product Managers is setting roadmap priorities without real market feedback.
Talvinder Singh, from a Pragmatic Leaders session on Competitive Research

Setting roadmap priorities without real market feedback is the biggest challenge Product Managers face. This is not an abstract problem — countless hours and engineering cycles are wasted building features that have no real backing in what customers or the market actually want. To paraphrase Jeff Bezos, nothing flattens a hierarchy like customer feedback. Your boss might disagree with your opinions, but it’s far harder to brush off direct customer insight.

Your actual job as a PM is to ground every decision in real market understanding. Without that, you are guessing — and guessing wrong is expensive.

This lesson teaches you how to do competitive research the right way: starting with your customers, mapping what they care about, and using that to evaluate where you stand against competitors. From there, you will learn to identify the unique attributes where you can win — not by chasing every feature your competitor has, but by delivering differentiated value.

The trap of feature parity in competitive research

Many PMs fall into the trap of trying to match competitor features in a checklist. The assumption is that if your product has every feature they do, you will win. This is a false assumption.

Competitive research is not about winning a feature war. For every feature you have that they don’t, they have something you lack. Features alone don’t tell the story of value or differentiation.

Instead, competitive research is about understanding the value delivered and how your product fits into the user’s context better than alternatives. It’s about positioning your product where it solves the most important problems for your users — better or differently than anyone else.

This means shifting from a feature list to a contextual competitive analysis — comparing customer business situations and outcomes your products deliver versus competitors.

Why market and competitive research matter

As a PM, you must make decisions with market context. Market research helps you:

  • Identify new markets or segments your product can enter
  • Understand your current market penetration and growth opportunities
  • Pinpoint the right target market for your product line
  • Monitor your organization’s reputation in the marketplace and act when needed
  • Identify gaps in the market that signal opportunities for new product development
  • Influence or redefine your marketing mix to better fit your customers
  • Position your product effectively against competitors

Without these insights, your roadmap is a shot in the dark.

Start with your customers, not your competitors

Your customer is your only true source of insight that can put you ahead of your competitors. Observing competitors can at best make you incrementally better — copying features or pricing rarely leads to breakthrough growth.

The right competitive research starts with talking to your users or prospective customers. Ask them what attributes they care about in a product like yours. What problems they prioritize. What trade-offs they accept.

From this, you can distill a list of attributes your users value. Only then should you evaluate your own product and your competitors’ products against those attributes.

The ignore-match-exceed framework for competitive assessment

Once you have the attributes, evaluate each against your product and competitors:

Attributes users care aboutYour ProductCompetitor #1Competitor #2Strategy
Attribute 1StrongWeakStrongMatch
Attribute 2YesYesNoExceed
Attribute 3MediumHighLowIgnore
  • Ignore: Attributes where competitors are strong but users do not prioritize. Avoid wasting effort here.
  • Match: Attributes users care about and where you can keep up with competitors.
  • Exceed: Attributes where you have an advantage or can build one, and users care deeply. This is your differentiation zone.

This framework helps you focus your roadmap on where you can win.

The big picture: Porter’s Five Forces and competition beyond companies

Competition is more than just other companies in your industry. Michael Porter’s Five Forces framework helps you understand the broader competitive landscape:

  • Threat of new entrants
  • Threat of substitutes
  • Supplier power
  • Buyer power
  • Competitive rivalry

For example, your competition might not be a direct rival product but a substitute that satisfies the same customer need. A manufacturer of eyeglasses competes indirectly with contact lens makers. Understanding this broad competition helps you position your product strategically.

Identifying direct and indirect competitors

  • Direct competitors: Products very similar to yours, serving the same market segment.
  • Indirect competitors: Different products or services that satisfy the same customer need or job.

In fragmented markets with many competitors, focus on the top 20% who capture 80% of the market revenue (the 80/20 rule). Keep an eye on emerging players who could disrupt your segment.

From feature tables to contextual competitive analysis

A feature table is a common tool where features sit in rows, and products in columns, with rankings on how well each product satisfies customers on each feature.

This can help identify gaps at a feature level, but it’s only the start.

A more insightful approach is contextual competitive analysis — comparing how your product and competitors perform in real customer business situations and the value delivered, not just features.

Research bridges the innovator’s dream and the real world

Innovation is not just about new code or shiny features. For your product to solve pains, hook users, provide delight, and become minimally viable, it needs context.

Understanding and modeling the world your product lives in — from both user and buyer perspectives — is essential.

Research builds this context for product management, design, and marketing.

MeetingScene: The competitive research kick-off

// scene:

Product strategy offsite at a Series A SaaS startup in Bangalore.

CEO: “Our competitors just launched a new analytics dashboard. We must catch up fast.”

Product Lead: “Before we jump to build, let’s talk to our customers to understand what they actually need from dashboards.”

Marketing Head: “Sales is hearing complaints about missing features, but is that the real pain point?”

You (PM): “Let’s list the attributes users care about, rate ourselves and competitors, then decide where we can win.”

This meeting set the tone for research-driven roadmap decisions instead of feature chasing.

// tension:

The pressure to build features fast versus the need to ground decisions in customer insight.

FieldExercise: Attribute-driven competitive analysis (15 min)

Choose a product you know well — it can be your own, or a competitor’s.

  1. Interview 3-5 users or potential users. Ask them what attributes or features matter most when choosing this product.
  2. List these attributes.
  3. Evaluate your product and two competitors on these attributes using a simple scale (e.g., 1-5 or High-Medium-Low).
  4. For each attribute, decide your strategy: ignore, match, or exceed.
  5. Reflect on your results: Where can you realistically differentiate? Where should you not waste effort?

This exercise grounds competitive research in real user priorities — the only source that matters.

SlackChat: Translating user feedback into competitive strategy

// thread: #product-team — Team aligning on competitive insights derived from user research
Neha (UX)User interviews show they care more about data accuracy than fancy dashboards.
Rahul (Sales)Competitor X has a flashy dashboard but customers say it’s slow and buggy.
You (PM)Let’s prioritize reliability and accuracy in our next release. Dashboards can come later.
Aarti (Engineering)We can optimize data pipelines to improve accuracy and speed.
Neha (UX)I’ll update wireframes to focus on key metrics users trust.

JudgmentExercise

scenario="You are the PM at a fintech startup in Mumbai preparing a competitive analysis. Your product offers a payments dashboard. Competitor A has a more feature-rich dashboard; Competitor B has fewer features but a reputation for reliability. User interviews reveal customers value uptime and accurate reporting over new features. Your CEO insists on matching Competitor A’s features to win market share." question="How do you advise the CEO on prioritizing roadmap features? What is your recommended approach to competitive positioning?" expertReasoning="Advise focusing on reliability and accuracy first, which users value most. Feature parity is costly and may not address user pain points. Position the product as the dependable choice. Collect metrics to demonstrate uptime improvements and accuracy. Use customer testimonials to support positioning. Feature chasing risks spreading engineering thin and missing what users care about." commonMistake="Many PMs try to match competitor features blindly to avoid losing market share. This leads to bloated products with poor user satisfaction. Ignoring user feedback and CEO pressure results in wasted resources and missed differentiation opportunities." />

// practice

You are the PM at a fintech startup in Mumbai preparing a competitive analysis. Your product offers a payments dashboard. Competitor A has a more feature-rich dashboard; Competitor B has fewer features but a reputation for reliability. User interviews reveal customers value uptime and accurate reporting over new features. Your CEO insists on matching Competitor A’s features to win market share.

Your task: How do you advise the CEO on prioritizing roadmap features? What is your recommended approach to competitive positioning?

your reasoning:

0 chars (min 80)

Synthesizing competitive insights into strategy

Competitive research is not an academic exercise. After gathering data, your job is to synthesize insights into clear, actionable strategies that guide product development and marketing.

This means:

  • Identifying gaps in the market your product can fill
  • Defining your unique value proposition against competitors
  • Prioritizing roadmap items that support your differentiation
  • Communicating these insights clearly to stakeholders across teams

A competitive insights report is a living document that keeps your team aligned and focused on what really matters.

AlumniCallout

Where to go next