The output should make the tradeoff visible enough for someone else to inspect, challenge, and act on.
loading…
project, program, change & delivery framework
Clarify responsible, accountable, consulted and informed roles.
quick answer
RACI Chart is a responsibility matrix for Responsibility assignment. It turns the decision into named fields, evidence, and a visible raci chart worksheet / visual.
The output should make the tradeoff visible enough for someone else to inspect, challenge, and act on.
Clarify responsible, accountable, consulted and informed roles.
Use DACI Framework when its output is closer to the conversation you need: Assign driver, approver, contributors and informed stakeholders.
worked example
A filled example is easier to understand than a blank template. Use it to see the shape before applying the framework to your own case.
The matrix exposes who owns each activity and where consultation or communication is required.
The matrix exposes who owns each activity and where consultation or communication is required.
generate yours
Start Ask PL with the framework, required inputs, and your context. It will ask for missing details, render the responsibility matrix, and explain what decision the output should change.
Apply RACI Chart to my situation. Context: [Decision, audience, options, evidence, and constraints.] Use the RACI Chart structure: - Rows: deliverables/tasks: - Columns: roles/people: - Cell values: Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed: Ask only for missing inputs that would change the output. Then render the responsibility matrix and name the decision it should change.
how to use it
Use the framework to change a decision, not to fill a worksheet. Start narrow, add evidence, then inspect what the raci chart worksheet / visual makes clearer.
Write the concrete responsibility assignment choice, tradeoff, or conversation the framework should change.
Fill the important slots: Rows: deliverables/tasks, Columns: roles/people, Cell values: Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed.
Mark what is measured, what comes from customers, and what is still judgment.
End with the next move, the riskiest assumption, or the evidence that would change the raci chart worksheet / visual.
quality check
Use this check after the artifact is filled. Blank fields are not failure; they are the next research question. Look for concrete evidence, missing constraints, and assumptions that would change the next move.
The framework needs a concrete decision. Broad intent turns it into a worksheet, not a decision aid.
Good framework output makes assumptions visible enough for someone else to challenge.
The diagram is useful only if it changes the next product conversation.
common mistakes
Do not use RACI Chart as a worksheet. Name the choice, conversation, or tradeoff the output should change.
Separate measured facts, customer evidence, and leadership judgment so weak assumptions stay visible.
If the diagram does not match the decision, switch frameworks instead of stretching the boxes.
The framework should clarify the next move. It should not replace strategy, sequencing, or judgment.
use something else when
Assign driver, approver, contributors and informed stakeholders.
Assign recommend, agree, perform, input and decide roles.
Define purpose, scope, objectives, stakeholders, risks and authority.
faq
Clarify responsible, accountable, consulted and informed roles.
Business context; objectives; available evidence; stakeholder judgment
RACI Chart worksheet / visual
Use RACI Chart when the decision matches this job: Clarify responsible, accountable, consulted and informed roles.
Avoid it when you need DACI Framework's output instead: Assign driver, approver, contributors and informed stakeholders.
It is both: a structure for thinking and a visible responsibility matrix that makes the decision easier to inspect.
A good input names the real decision, uses concrete evidence, and separates facts from assumptions.
Use the raci chart worksheet / visual to choose the next move, name the riskiest assumption, or decide what evidence would change the call.
Use DACI Framework when the real output you need is closer to: Assign driver, approver, contributors and informed stakeholders.
Yes. Describe your context and Ask PL can ask for missing inputs, render the responsibility matrix, and explain what decision it should change.